Monday, December 15, 2008

Over-Blown

From Alameda, CA:
Back to index
Leaf-blowers Blow My Mind

I know it may seem a bit odd that, after extolling the wonders of real grass in my last column, I should now be sharing my very real concerns about a tool that has become ubiquitous in the yard-care arsenal — the leaf blower.

I know it may seem a bit odd that, after extolling the wonders of real grass in my last column, I should now be sharing my very real concerns about a tool that has become ubiquitous in the yard-care arsenal — the leaf blower.

Or, in the case of Alameda, dozens and dozens of leaf-blowers. Leaf-blowers filling the air with an incessant drone not unlike a flight of huge, angry wasps. Leaf-blowers spewing gaseous fumes into our usually fresh sweet air. Leaf-blowers sending up clouds of dirt, dust, bugs, leaf parts, and, perhaps, dried animal fecal matter. Delightful. Not to mention the questionable use of fossil fuels, which are limited in abundance and the burning of which contributes to global climate change.

Leaf-blowers are used by private gardeners, paid gardening services and Alameda's park department. I am often assaulted on my way to yoga class in Lincoln Park by huge — usually head-high — billows of dust and dirt, generated by the leaf-blowers wielded by ARPD employees who, more often than not, have face-mask protection from the dirt pollution, if not the noxious odor of their machines, and headphone-style ear protection from the racket.

I also watch in horrified fascination as the hardworking staff blows one pile of dirt and leaves to one side of a walkway, a few short feet, and then repeats the process blowing in the opposite direction, same pile. For minutes and minutes at a time. Amazing. The sound blasting into the yoga class is unsettling to say the least.

And in my own neighborhood, my home is invaded on a regularly scheduled basis by the noise, poisonous fumes and dirt from hired gardening services ministering to my neighbors' post-card-sized yards. If I am not fast enough in dashing from open window to open window, slamming them shut on otherwise lovely warm breezy afternoons, I am rewarded with deafening — literally cannot hear myself speak to my children — noise, gas fumes, dried fertilizer and who knows what, storming through my kitchen, bedrooms and bathrooms.

But enough about me. What are some of the facts about the efficiencies and dangers of leaf-blowers? According to the California EPA Air Quality Resources Board, each leaf-blower engine, although seemingly tiny, churns out the equivalent of the same smoggy pollution as 80 cars, each driven for 12,500 miles every year. In fact, all small-engine yard machines, including lawn mowers, weed trimmers and leaf-blowers, contribute five percent of all our air pollution annually. And with the lack of emission controls on these devices, that consists of carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxide and volatile organic compounds, all the components of global warming chemicals.

Besides creating air pollution and using scarce resources, leaf-blowers are also responsible for noise pollution, a type of infringement on our senses that can have serious negative health impacts. A normal decibel level, considered acceptable in residential areas, is about 60 decibels (60dB). Every increase in decibels means noise that is 10 times louder. Leaf-blowers usually generate about 70-75 dB. According to the U.S. EPA this level of noise actually degrades quality of life by interfering with communication and sleep, leads to reduced accuracy of work and increased levels of aggravation, which can linger hours after exposure.

In other words, noise from leaf-blowers stresses us out. And one of the problems is we have no control over the noise which often emanates from less than two feet away from our homes. Check out this Web site for more very important information on leaf-blower noise and its affect on our mental and physical health: www.nonoise.org/quietnet/cqs/leafblow.htm. I can hear many people right now saying, "I had no idea the sound and pollution from my leaf-blower was such a problem, but I am not physically able, and don't have the time, to sweep or rake my yard." Some may also be saying, "I pay a gardening service. I can't tell them what equipment to use."

Well, first of all, yards in Alameda tend to be very small, minute even. If we all used rakes and brooms we probably would have the endurance and stamina to handle this typically small amount of work, because we will have been doing it all along. More physical exercise makes us stronger, after all. And if we have time to space out in front our of TVs for more than an hour a week, then we have time to do some leaf-raking. Start with a little and build up your strength, enjoy the fresh, quiet outdoors, and chat with your very grateful neighbors.

Second, if you hire a gardening service, remember you are the boss. Buy your own rake and broom, and request or insist they use these tools on your property. I have to think the rising cost of fuel is eating into the profits these services garner from their contracts. They may actually see more money in their pockets if you release them from the obligation to use power tools in your yard.

As for the argument it will simply take too long to use manual yard tools, consider this from Diane Wolfberg's Web site: "In 1998, in a dramatic competition sponsored by the Los Angeles City Council, Grandma Diane swept and cleared leaves off a designated area faster than a professionally operated power leaf-blower. The petite grandmother's stunning victory inspired hundreds of thousands of suburbanites across the country tired of endless leaf-blowing." So there you have it. Breaking the leaf-blower habit means yard care that is cheaper, cleaner, faster and, frankly, more courteous.

In February 2008 the Alameda City Council adopted the Local Action Plan for Climate Protection. What is more local than banning the use of leaf-blowers, for a start? Then moving on to larger yard machines. There is also a new collaboration between private and public interests — Community Action for Sustainable Alameda. (CASA).

My casa is your casa. What happens in our parks, in our yards, affects us all. Learn more at www.ci.alameda.ca.us.

When fall brings leaves tumbling down soon, pick up a rake. Pick up a broom. Put your leaf-blower down, and just back away. Give us all a nice, quiet, crisp autumn day.

Noelle Robbins is an Alameda writer. Contact her at robbins@alamedanet.net.


http://www.alamedasun.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3940&Itemid=22



A Time for Calm


The Autumn Leaves


Imagine autumn in New England. On a quiet fall day, one sits and watches the red and gold leaves swirl down to a softly gurgling brook. Cool, clean breezes refresh the soul.

Now, shift to Atlanta. As the first leaves of autumn fall from the oaks, panic grips the residents of apartment and condo complexes. There will be leaves in the parking lot. Leaves will clutter the space between our parked cars on the street. Even before the leaves fall, three, four, five workers rev up their blowers to max speed: 200 mph. Their instructions? leave not one leaf on the grounds, the walks or the street. Get rid of them! Of course there's no need to worry about where you blow them. If there get to be too many, we'll scoop them up in a tarp. But meanwhile, we'll just blow them until they aren't visible any more, or cleverly concealed in the groundcover.

Consider the results: at 200mph, the hot winds from the blowers lift not only the leaves, but enormous quantities of dirt. The dust and dirt rise as high as the rooftops of three story buildings and coat everything as they begin a slow descent. The hot wind destroys whatever grass there is and, week by week, kills the shrubs. Landscapes that are blown weekly, especially in times of drought or hot weather are bare, whatever fertile soil there was-- gone with the wind. All one needs to do is walk around the neighborhood of a complex that is blown to see the damage. In contrast to the healthy shrubs, green lawns, and blooming groundcover of all the neighborhood properties, the blown landscapes are dead. The difference is startling.

Consider this as well: those workers who spend their days blowing dirt and dust, including the lead filled dust of the street, the anti-freeze, the organic and inorganic compounds of car drippings, animal feces, mold, and allergens are very likely to suffer respiratory illness.
Autumn is an interesting time in Atlanta. Though we are all aware of the city's infamous air pollution, many of us do little to prevent it. We drive SUVs and we blow our lawns dry with gasoline fumes that add significantly to the pollution. The price we are paying for anal retentive tidiness may be an insidious filth that coats our houses inside and out, and settles in our lungs and sinuses.


On the other hand, looking at the ordinances of over 350 progressive communities around the country that limit the use and kinds of blowers used, might eventually bring us back to the good old days of quiet contemplation of the beauty of autumn leaves, the refreshing breezes of cooler weather, and the peace of mind of a quiet fall day.



About
350 cities and towns have banned or controlled blowers nationwide

Towns that banned blowers (partial list) Most recent:
Greenberg, NY 2007 (read)
Mamaroneck, NY 2007 (
read)
Palo Alto, CA starting Jan 1-06 (
read)
Pelham Manor, NY starting Jan 06

Aspen, CO July 18-05 (read) and (pdf)
Houston, Texas July 18-05 (
read)
Evanston, IL 2005 (read)
Vancouver
, BC Feb 04 (
read)

In process:
Greenwich, CT, June 06 - considering citizen request for a ban (read)
Cambridge, MA - March 20, 2006 and November 2006 (read) - City Manager ordered by Council to report on an amendment to the Municipal Code
to ban leaf blowers

Also:
Berkeley, CA (
read)
Belvedere, CA
Beverly Hills, CA (banned in
1978 read)
Carmel, CA (banned in
1975)
Claremont, CA (read)
Del Mar, CA (
read)
Hermosa Beach, CA

Laguna Beach, CA (read)
Lawndale, CA
Los Altos, CA (
read)
Malibu, CA

Menlo Park, CA (read)
Mill Valley, CA

New Rochelle, NY (read)
Pelham, NY (read)
Princeton, NJ (1998)
Rye, NY
Santa Barbara, CA

Santa Monica, CA
Scarsdale, NY
Seattle, WA
West Hollywood, CA

White Plains, NY


Towns with blower use & noise ordinances (parial list)

Most recent:
Toronto, CND starting Feb-06 (read)

Also:
Boulder, CO
Foster City, CA (
read)
Indian Wells, CA (
read)
Los Angeles, CA (
read)
Montclair, NJ (pending read)
Oyster Bay, NY
Portsmouth, NH (
read)
Sacramento, CA
Sunnyvale, CA
Winnetka, IL

States controlling leaf blowers:

California
Small Engine Pollution Rules - 2007 read

About 13% of Californians live in cities that ban the use of leaf blowers, and six of the ten largest California cities have ordinances that restrict or ban leaf blowers. All together, about one hundred California cities have ordinances that restrict either leaf blowers specifically or all gardening equipment generally, including the cities with bans on leaf blower use (IME 1999). In 2000. nationwide, two states, Arizona and New Jersey, have considered laws at the state level, and five other states have at least one city with a leaf blower ordinance (IME 1999).
Source: California 79-page Report of the State's Environmental Protection Agency (pdf)

Arizona
Pending legislation - 2007 read




Silence of the Lawnblasters

From Concord, New Hampshire:

Ban on leaf blowers worth consideration


Published: Saturday, Sep. 29, 2007
KEY POINTS
BACKGROUND: Several hundred cities and towns across the nation have banned the use of gas-powered leaf blowers.

CONCLUSION: Given the negative impact they have on the environment and quality of life, more communities should consider doing the same.

Falling leaves, once the inspiration of poets and songwriters, now mark the death of peace and quiet. As soon as they drop, homeowners and landscapers attack them maniacally with leaf blowers. The din from the screeching machines bores into the brain. The crisp fall air fills with exhaust fumes and dust.

More than 200 cities and towns have declared gas-powered leaf blowers a nuisance and public health hazard and banned them. Other communities have restricted the hours they may be used and banned blowing dust and litter onto the property of others or onto public property. Some have prohibited use of the machines where population density is high.

In the Live Free or Die state, a ban would bring wails of protest. And, if courtesy and common sense were common, a ban would be unnecessary. Unfortunately, at least in the most densely settled parts of Concord, it's worth considering. Enact one, and the growing number of people who work from home or work nights would be eternally grateful.

Noise isn't the only problem with leaf blowers, which tend to be run longer and more often than string trimmers, lawn mowers and other gas-powered tools. New Hampshire, on many days, has unhealthy air.

According to the Asthma Regional Council of New England, the Granite State has the highest rate of adult asthma in the nation. New Hampshire places third in childhood asthma rates behind Maine and Massachusetts.

Leaf blowers are a small part of the problem, but they contribute to it in dangerous ways. Like other two-cycle gasoline engines, they generate a remarkable amount of pollution for their size – the equivalent in one hour of driving a car 100 miles, the Los Angeles chapter of the American Lung Association says.

Worse perhaps, they make airborne stuff that should stay on the ground: lead dust from the paint used on older homes, asbestos dust from car brake linings, mold, pollen, herbicide residue and tiny particles of dog feces.

Many people who use leaf blowers blast the dust into the road – the modern equivalent of emptying chamber pots in the gutter – where each passing car or truck makes it airborne again.

Children and people with breathing problems are advised to go indoors or leave the area when the machines are in use.

Concord has ordinances to control noise and make it illegal to create "fugitive dust," but they're inadequate and rarely enforced. The noise ordinance prohibits the operation of lawnmowers or "an internal combustion engine blowers or power fan" between 9 p.m. and 7 a.m., which most of the year, means when it's dark. Those laws need to be toughened and, when prompted by complaints, enforced, first with warnings then with fines.

Landscapers will argue that requiring the use of rakes or brooms or even less powerful electric blowers will take more time and drive up prices. But what price should be put on the ability to breathe decent air, hear the church bells and birds on Sunday morning, or hold a conversation in one's own yard?

– Concord Monitor

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Dirt Blowing is a Hazard

An excellent source of information on the harm dust blowers do is:

http://www.ccblincoln.com/index.html


From this web site:

About
350 cities and towns have banned or controlled blowers nationwide

Towns that banned blowers (partial list) Most recent:
Greenberg, NY 2007 (read)
Mamaroneck, NY 2007 (
read)
Palo Alto, CA starting Jan 1-06 (
read)
Pelham Manor, NY starting Jan 06

Aspen, CO July 18-05 (read) and (pdf)
Houston, Texas July 18-05 (
read)
Evanston, IL 2005 (read)
Vancouver
, BC Feb 04 (
read)

In process:
Greenwich, CT, June 06 - considering citizen request for a ban (read)
Cambridge, MA - March 20, 2006 and November 2006 (read) - City Manager ordered by Council to report on an amendment to the Municipal Code
to ban leaf blowers

Also:
Berkeley, CA (
read)
Belvedere, CA
Beverly Hills, CA (banned in
1978 read)
Carmel, CA (banned in
1975)
Claremont, CA (read)
Del Mar, CA (
read)
Hermosa Beach, CA

Laguna Beach, CA (read)
Lawndale, CA
Los Altos, CA (
read)
Malibu, CA

Menlo Park, CA (read)
Mill Valley, CA

New Rochelle, NY (read)
Pelham, NY (read)
Princeton, NJ (1998)
Rye, NY
Santa Barbara, CA

Santa Monica, CA
Scarsdale, NY
Seattle, WA
West Hollywood, CA

White Plains, NY


Towns with blower use & noise ordinances (parial list)

Most recent:
Toronto, CND starting Feb-06 (read)

Also:
Boulder, CO
Foster City, CA (
read)
Indian Wells, CA (
read)
Los Angeles, CA (
read)
Montclair, NJ (pending read)
Oyster Bay, NY
Portsmouth, NH (
read)
Sacramento, CA
Sunnyvale, CA
Winnetka, IL

States controlling leaf blowers:

California
Small Engine Pollution Rules - 2007 read

About 13% of Californians live in cities that ban the use of leaf blowers, and six of the ten largest California cities have ordinances that restrict or ban leaf blowers. All together, about one hundred California cities have ordinances that restrict either leaf blowers specifically or all gardening equipment generally, including the cities with bans on leaf blower use (IME 1999). In 2000. nationwide, two states, Arizona and New Jersey, have considered laws at the state level, and five other states have at least one city with a leaf blower ordinance (IME 1999).
Source: California 79-page Report of the State's Environmental Protection Agency (pdf)

Arizona
Pending legislation - 2007 read




Alternatives to the Gas Blower

Thanks to:

Citizens League for Environmental Action Now
5120 Woodway Drive, Suite #9004 · Houston, Texas 77056
phone: (713) 524-3000 · email: info@cleanhouston.org
For the following alternatives to the Blower:

books | archives | editorials

Alternatives to Gas-Powered Leaf Blowers

There are numerous issues associated with using gas-powered (GP) leaf blowers, but the main concerns are: noxious emissions, propulsion of ground level materials into the air and the incessant, blaring noise. GP blowers emit as much pollution in an hour as a car would if it drove 100 miles. California’s Air Resource Board reports that the 2-stroke engines emit several pounds of particulate matter into air every hour they are in use. In addition to the pollution produced by the blowers themselves, they also force harmful ground-level substances to become airborne. Pollen, feces and other dust particles as well as particularly dangerous substances like lead, organic carbon, chromium, arsenic, cadmium, nickel and mercury which accumulate along street curbs are blown into the air where they are inhaled by pedestrians.

Most leaf blowers operate at levels of 70-75 decibels, about 100 times the level to which health experts say the human ear can be safely subjected. A majority of blowers used in Houston today are, in fact, in violation of the city’s noise ordinance. The ordinance states that, “no person shall conduct, permit or allow any activity or sound source to produce a sound that is discernible beyond the property lines of the property on which the sound is being received that when measured … exceeds sixty-five (65) dB(A) during daytime hours and fifty-eight (58) dB(A) during nighttime hours.” This regulation is rarely, if ever, enforced when it comes to leaf blowers.

The best alternatives to gas-powered leaf blowers are devices that are quiet, pollution-free, and keep ground-level dust and substances from becoming airborne to a minimum. There are several reasonable and affordable options available to lawn maintenance professionals and home owners for the collection of leaves and other yard debris. Here is a brief list and description of options available now.

The old Rake and Broom
Rakes and brooms are, by far, the safest, easiest to use and most inexpensive of all methods. They are also lightweight, easy to store, emissions-free, very quiet and require little maintenance. Diane Wolfberg, a grandmother in her late 50s, conducted several tests administered by the LA Department of Water & Power to gauge the speed and effectiveness of using a rake and broom versus gas and electric powered leaf blowers. In three tests, Mrs. Wolfberg cleaned specified areas using a rake and broom faster than the electric blower and nearly as fast as the gas powered blower, both of which were operated by lawn maintenance professionals. On all three tests the rake and broom proved to do a more thorough job of cleaning the areas than either of the power blowers. (source: January 8, 1998 press release from Zero Air Pollution)

Yard Vacuums/Blowers
In addition to the concerns of air pollution and noise, there is the issue of the effectiveness of leaf blowers. Often yardmen tend to blow leaves from one side of the property to other, leaving pockets of debris scattered throughout the lawn. Leaves on the edges of employer’s property lines are often blown into the street or into a neighbor’s lawn, only to be blown back by the neighbor’s lawn crew several days later. Our suggested solution: vacuuming up the debris with electric leaf ‘blower’ units. Many manufacturers offer units that can be switched over to act as vacuums. Electric engines provide plenty of power, are 50 - 70% quieter than gas powered leaf blowers and emit no air pollution. If yardmen used electric leaf blowers to vacuum up and mulch yard debris, it would eliminate virtually all the air pollution problems and greatly reduce the issue of noise. Many of the new ‘blowers’ have mulch ratios of 10:1, and can reduce leaf and grass clippings to a tenth of their former size. Yard debris account for a full 20% of landfill waste! While we would recommend that this mulch be used to naturally nourish the flowers, trees and grass on one’s own property- should it be thrown away, it will take up a tenth of the space it would have, had it not been vacuumed and mulched. Many of those who have switched from blowing to vacuuming, report that it is faster and leaves the yard in a cleaner state. It seems rather inefficient use of time to blow huge piles of leaves around and then bag them afterwards when you could do it all in one step using a vacuum unit.

There are several major brands, including Craftsman, Toro, Ryobi and Black & Decker that offer electric models with vacuuming and mulching functions. They can be purchased at local major retail stores like Home Depot, Lowes and Sears.

Mowers
While you might not think of using a mower as a tool to collect leaves and other yard debris, many mowers have the ability to not only cut grass, but also vacuum, mulch and store leaves, grass clippings and other yard debris. A new generation of electric and reel mowers have emerged, providing consumers with the opportunity to maintain their lawns without emitting pollution or making a lot of noise. They are available in both manual and battery powered versions at prices comparable to, and sometimes well below, gas-powered mowers. With fewer moving parts, reel mowers require substantially less maintenance and tend to have longer lives. Pollution-free electric mowers are a little louder, but they provide more power which allows for faster mowing.

Brill brand mowers receive the high ratings for performance, affordability, and ease of use for both their reel and electric engine mowers. Unfortunately, they don’t seem to be carried by any local Houston retailers. However, a Dallas based company called Clean Air Gardening has a variety of Brill mowers and offer fast, free shipping as well as a 60-day money back guarantee. Locally, Ace Hardware has a good selection of electric and reel mowers at fair prices. Home Depot, Lowes and Sears also carry brand names like Black & Decker, Craftsman, Bolens and MTD.

Sweepers
Silent and pollution-free, lawn sweepers quickly and easily pick up leaves, grass clippings, twigs and other yard debris without sending dust flying into the air. Some models are specifically for use on the hardscape (i.e sidewalk, walkway, street, etc), but others can handle your yard refuse on grass and concrete surfaces.

Home Depot carries a Gleason brand sweeper that can be used on grass and hard surfaces. Ace Hardware is a primary retailer of the Agri-Fab lawn sweeper, but it is not a regularly stocked product so you will have to ask the store to order it for you.


Too Much Hot Air

This site will become a gathering place for all who think so-called leaf blowers are a dangerous threat to the environment. Dirt blowers produce air pollution and noise pollution that is not acceptable, especially in warm climates and where there is drought.

We shall provide links and articles here that show what damage blowers do and to provide a common-sense alternative or solution to the problems they cause.

Today's article sets the tone: it comes from North Carolina:

Drought-induced insanity

By Ken Moore

Observations made from around town and the region during this summer-long drought have made me believe that our society is really insane.

Last week, while helping hand-water a native plant garden in Raleigh, making certain all the water went into the ground and not off onto the pavement, an awful noise from the Legislative grounds across the street made me turn to observe grounds staff mowing turf that was so short that it was difficult to distinguish between mown and un-mown areas. Accompanying the mowers were other grounds staff with leaf blowers, methodically walking along the curb blowing dust back and forth. This activity is a weekly routine.

That same day, driving into Hillsborough in the mid-afternoon, I observed impact sprinklers throwing water on the pavement and roadway in what was a faulty design to water a narrow strip of grass between the road and the parking lot of one of the fast food stops.

Across from my little house on the edge of Carrboro are two apartment complexes. There we have the weekly mowing of brown turf not high enough to meet the lowest mower blades. And I have listened to and watched accompanying leaf blowers go back and forth along all the walkways and roadside curbs blowing nothing but dust into the air. That’s air pollution, noise pollution and waste of diminishing fuel supplies. Back in the days when we had rain, I witnessed leaf blowers over at University Mall blowing water back and forth along the parking lot curbs; at least the dust was settled.

Then I see sprinklers throwing water over expansive lawns, the water blowing away in the breeze.

All those signs reading “We Use Well Water” seem to be license for freely throwing water about the landscape and encouraging more car washing with nary a concern for our lack of rain.

Finally the local papers are now describing that we are in an extreme drought and even some communities with muddy water coming through their pipes are beginning to set or consider setting water restrictions.

We must be insane.

We place a greater priority on short green grass than on big shade trees.

Community elected officials, town staff and business owners lack the resolve to establish guidelines for reducing waste of water and fuel, noise pollution and air pollution on urban and residential landscapes.

Contracts for weekly landscape maintenance, even during normal growing conditions, is foolish environmental pollution and waste of energy resources.

Landscapes mown and blown once every three weeks should suffice.

Three-weeks-tall grass is really not life threatening.

Taking refuge behind those “We Use Well Water” signs doesn’t impress me. All that well water is coming from the underground water table. Lots of folks like me don’t have access to city water but our well water is also dependent upon our shared larger water tables. We don’t appreciate other folks freely using the Earth’s groundwater with such disregard for the good of the community.

So, are we insane? As you move about your community, take note of how we behave, and you decide. When you see water running off of landscapes, see sprinklers blowing mist away on the breeze, see irrigation systems operating during rain showers, see mowers running over brown or short turf and see blowers just moving dust back and forth, bring sanity back to our actions.

Please stop and speak to the homeowner or business owner and let them know how you feel. After all, it’s not just my world. It’s also your living environment that is being wasted and polluted.

Footnote: Tuesday evening’s welcome rain registered an inch in my rain gauge and my three rain barrels filled to the brim. However, please note that our drought seriously continues. I pulled back the mulch under the Weaver Street Market trees and the soil below the mulch was still bone dry. Tree roots did not receive the much-needed moisture!!!

http://www.carrborocitizen.com/main/2007/08/23/drought-induced-insanity/#comment-6843

Please email me at Jack1132@yahoo.com. Let's start a Grassroots (pun intended) effort to eliminate dirt blowers.